There is No Gay 2+2=4

One of the things that bothers me so much about the naked social engineering of the left it their blatant, Marxist skewing of history. We are told for example that before the 60’s women were poor miserable creatures in abject subjugation, only able to have freedom when their oppressors were passed out drunk after having beaten them and the poor children. That what we think of as a loving familial relationship today only existed in subversive households that fought against the norm.

The norm, of course, must've been horrible, most men cared nothing for their wives, other than considering them servants that they could have babies with legally and with social acceptance. Any literature or movies or works of art or anything historical that challenged this, the portrayed pre-60s life much like the life that married people live now was adopted and redefined as subversive and proto-feminist. And what we have now is almost new men and new women, whose relationships bear no resemblance to the relationships that existed before third wave feminism.

The reality of course is that nothing much has really changed inside marriage. You have to believe that men and women are completely different. That before feminism women couldn't make their husbands miserable, that they had no power in the relationship, and that all men were happy to dehumanize and objectify their wives and children. In fact you have to believe that human nature is clearly different now and changed almost overnight when the "Feminist Mystique" was written.

This is all horse hockey, human nature hasn't changed; men have always been drawn to love their wives and society has always looked down on husbands that don't. Women have always had power, albeit hidden, over their men, even the Old Testament knew this: “It is better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and an angry woman (Proverbs 21:19)”. Nothing has really changed, we just became arrogant, "chronologically arrogant" as C.S. Lewis called it, the idea that everyone that lived in a different time or situation than we do now must have been miserable and had no real chance at happiness. Pure stupidity!

What has happened is that the 60s asinine belief that public life and private life must contain no dissimilarities or contradictions if there are, then there is self-evident hypocrisy. After this the 90s and their attempt to police thought enforce that all public opinions are the correct opinions by manipulating language and we end up in this idiotic social situation that we have today. Everything private must be open to the public, and we must all express the limited range of correct feelings about it.

We believe that all groups that claim to be oppressed were always treated horribly in all situations and never had any sort of a normal life. The fact that maybe they had to hide their abnormality from the world in public meant that they were psychologically damaged. Or that someone might have made fun of them means that they never had a chance for happiness. The fact that some very funny things might've been said against their particular group meant that they can never have had friends. So all of these things must be regulated and stamped out and all unrelated things must be collapsed into this defining characteristic.

Before the 60s there were gays, before the 60s people knew there were gays, before the 60s people knew other people who were gay and were fine with it. They understood that there were public things and private things, and it is possible to do a very wide range of public things that were unrelated to the societal abnormality. You could have a job as an accountant and be gay, those were separate things. You could be a good driver and be gay, those were separate things.

Now however, they are all the same thing. Those with societal abnormalities (and we all have societal abnormalities) now wrap all of their lives around that abnormality. It used to be that an accountant was an accountant, and at home or outside of work you could be gay, hetero, metro, swinger or whatever. But now because we have no public/private divide, what you are at work is what you are at home and vice-versa (and your bosses know it and, so,invade deeper and deeper into your non-work time). So you used to be Jim the Accountant that worked in cubicle 8G. Now you are, and we are required to think of you as, Gay Jim the Gay Accountant that works in the gay cubicle 8G. Now I am Frank that works in cubicle 9G, and I am ambivalent about whom you have sex with. Use to be that was ok, but now I must think the right thoughts about you and they all have to be focused on your sexuality. I can’t say, “Good job on the TPS reports Jim.” It has to be, “Good gay job on the gay TPS reports Gay Jim (and that is great, gay means you’re edgier, and classier and richer and in all ways better than me. Gosh I wish I had enough money not spent on my kids to buy your expensive hair product).” But you want to know the difference between a gay TPS report and a non-gay TPS report? What about a gay job on them and just a job on them? Nothing, absolutely no fricking thing at all! What should be the difference between Jim and Gay Jim at the accounting office? Nothing!

And so here is the point: I am sick and tired of being told that I have to care about something that shouldn’t affect me at all, I don’t care really if you are gay or black or oriental or red-neck or green. What does make me want to strangle cats is you telling me I have to care about your abnormality, and I have to care in the right way in our societies Orwellian language. So here is the deal you act like you belong in society when you are in society and I won’t give a crap about how you are in private.