Thursday, November 24, 2011

The Christian Apologist’s Dilemma


 Science is a Christian pursuit.  That is the truth of it, and the whole truth of it.  There is no other world view that would allow for it to exist.  The earliest scientists were Christians.  The most influential scientists up to the 20th century were Christians.  And even now Christians desire to be scientists, and reject the secularist idea of science being anti-theistic. 

But Christians now must fight against Science, and here is the dilemma, must do so while upholding the validity of science.  We must because when science is seen in the right light, it gives us as much truth as humanity can gain (not very much by the way), and it is a great tool that we Christians can use. 

Thus we are hamstrung in ways that our opponents aren’t.  They have no use for Christianity, and to them, it is a lie that no one should even consider.  And so they get to pull out all the stops.  There is no argument off limits be they logical, philosophical or personal.  They get to use them against us and open up with both barrels. 

This is the reason that in almost all arguments, Christians seem over matched.  We need to affirm what is true about what our opponents believe and then try to attack it at the same time.  This leads to our usually timidity in the arguments.  And it leads to the dilemma that we always meet in these fights, and our wishy-washy-ness.  “It is true, but not true enough!”, we protest, making us sound weak.

So I propose we start looking at things from a holistic stance.  Here it is: If we argue against the irrational, we attack their irrationality as fiercely as they attack the Rational God.  If they are rationalists, we attack them as fiercely as they attack the incomprehensibility of God.  If they are Scientists we attack science, and we attack it like it isn’t true, like they attack our intangible God.  If they are spiritualist, we attack their disembodied Gnosticism the same way they attack the Physical Jesus.

We do this because what they believe isn’t true, that is the trick.  Science is only true when it is brought into the right relationship with the Bible.  When it is outside that right relationship, it is a lie and smells of fire and brimstone.  So solve the dilemma, by denying that they have anything of worth to say.  Because they don’t.